I'm not giving my ten-year-old a smartphone, and I'm tired of being told that makes me the problem. Four minutes — there's a third option.

Someone at work said it to me last week: "Just get her a phone. Every kid has one. You're making this harder than it needs to be."
And I did that thing where you smile and say "yeah, probably."
But I'm not. I'm looking at the two choices parents get, and neither one is what I want.
And when people say "just get her a phone," they say it like a phone is one simple thing.
It isn't:
I wanted my daughter to reach me. I didn't want to hand her everything else to make that happen.
SHOW ME THE THIRD OPTION — 25% OFFOld phone. Everything shut down — no social, no browser, no App Store, a few approved contacts. For about a month I thought I'd solved it.
Suddenly I wasn't staying connected to my kid. I was managing a smartphone.
And it still wasn't doing the one job I bought it for. Because a phone is something a kid has to notice — charged, findable, not on silent, notification seen, worth answering, unlocked.
Six gates between "I need Mom" and reaching Mom.
I thought I needed a way to check on her.
What I needed was a way for the responsibility to stay with me.
Because "you're in charge for a few minutes" isn't really about watching her brother. She can do that.
It's: if he falls, is it serious? If someone knocks, what do we do? If he climbs something, handle it or come get me?
A ten-year-old hanging out with her little brother is one thing. A ten-year-old feeling like she's the highest-ranking person in the house is another.

RangerTalk. Two handheld video walkie-talkies. She has one. I have the other. One button, and we can see and hear each other.
Here's the part that sold me — what it doesn't have:
The two handsets pair straight to each other on 2.4GHz. No inbound path — nobody can reach my kid on it, because there's nothing to reach her through.
That's the part I didn't expect to feel so good about.
One afternoon her brother started doing something she wasn't sure about. Instead of standing there trying to figure out what I would do, she called me.
"Mom? He's doing this. What should I do?"
I answered her. That was it.
She didn't have to make the decision. She just had to reach me.
I didn't need a browser. I didn't need an App Store. I didn't need another monthly line. I needed my daughter to say "Mom?" and hear me answer.
“We use ours upstairs and downstairs all the time and haven’t had an issue. My daughter can be in her room while I’m in the kitchen and we can still hear and see each other clearly. We’ve also used it from the backyard into the house.”
“My 8-year-old figured it out in a few minutes. We turned them on, showed her which button to press, and that was basically it. No app, no account, no complicated setup.”
“We’ve been using ours around our neighborhood and haven’t picked up anyone else so far. I like that there’s no phone number, app, or contact list involved. I still wouldn’t call any radio device 100% private, but we haven’t had interference in normal use.”
A smartphone: $200–$800, plus $15–$40 a month. A kids' smartwatch: $100–$200, plus $10–$25 a month.
This is $59.95 for the pair. Once. Nothing to activate. Nothing to cancel. Nothing that comes with it.
Use them for a month. If you still feel like a smartphone is the only real answer, send them back for a full refund. No explanation required.
If you've been holding the line on the smartphone thing, you're not the only one.
Maybe ten isn't the right age yet. Maybe you don't want every app, notification and group chat that comes with it. Maybe you still want your kid to be able to reach you.
Those don't contradict each other. You were just given two options for too long.
There can be something in between. And no — she's still not getting a smartphone.
GET MY RANGERTALK SET — 25% OFF